In the Anthropocene, the construction industry generates vast quantities of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW), positioning cities as latent material reservoirs rather than endpoints of consumption. This research investigates CDW not as waste, but as a designed material system. Initial experiments explored rammed CDW composites, revealing strong compressive behavior but critical limitations under lateral forces and impact, leading to brittle failure. While compression performance showed promise, it remained insufficient for structural application.

Subsequent material studies introduced binders, demonstrating that controlled grading and minimal cement stabilization significantly improve cohesion and strength, though material alone could not resolve tensile weakness. This shifted the research toward spanning systems, integrating tensile members to compensate for material limitations. Experiments with natural fibers and reclaimed steel informed the transition to hybrid systems, ultimately incorporating salvaged rebars from construction sites.

The project proposes a precast ribbed slab system, where geometry, reinforcement, and material grading work together to achieve structural performance. Only cement is introduced as a virgin material, while aggregates and steel are reclaimed, forming a predominantly upcycled system. Prototyping focuses on flexural behavior and assembly logic.

At an urban scale, a digital interface enables the identification, evaluation, and controlled extraction of CDW, structuring a pipeline from demolition to fabrication. The work hypothesizes a scalable system where buildings become material sources, processed, assembled, and reconstituted into new architectural elements.

Figure 1: Research Question. Scott Jacobsen. A building that has been torn down and is being demolished. Unsplash, 2023.
Figure 2: Framing Analysis. Agència de Residus de Catalunya. Balanç de la gestió dels residus municipals a Catalunya 2024–2025. Generalitat de Catalunya, 2025.

Typical CDW composition in Catalonia mirrors the European pattern: concrete ≈ 40 %, brick waste 20‑25 %, steel‑metal ≈ 10 %, glass ≈ 10 %, with additional fractions of asphalt/bitumen, gypsum/plaster and ceramic mix 10‑25 % that together complete the material balance.

These figures illustrate that Catalonia’s construction sector generates a substantial volume of material that is only partially reintegrated into the circular economy, underscoring the urgent need for more effective waste‑reduction, material‑recovery and reuse strategies.

Figure 3: Sankey Diagram. Muzioreva, H., Musonda, I. and Gumbo, T. (2026)Digital tool applications in construction and demolition waste management: a systematic mapping review, Frontiers in Built Environment.

Material Focus

Figure 4: Structural Research. Article 3924, Materiales de Construcción. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
ResearchGate, Reinforced Concrete Beams with Recycled Aggregates from Demolished Concrete of a Stadium.

Research Gap

Figure 5: Identification and Representation of Research Gaps.

Urban Mining Workflow

Figure 6: Sourcing and Collection

Material Processing

Figure 7: Classification Schema for Mineral Material Categories.
Figure 8: Mineral Breakdown: Crushing, Sieving, and Particle Sorting.

Particle Size as Design Parameter

Figure 9: Mineral Particle Size Catalogue.
Figure 10: Granular Material Intelligence and Analytical Framework. Sharaky, Ibrahim; Usama Issa; Mamdooh Alwetaishi; Ahmed Abdelhafiz; Amal Shamseldin;
Mohammed Al-Surf; Mosleh Al-Harthi; and Ashraf Balabel. Strength and Water Absorption of Sustainable Concrete Produced with Recycled Basaltic
Concrete Aggregates and Powder
. Sustainability 13, no. 11 (2021): 6277.
Figure 11: Systematic Mapping of Material Properties. Sharaky, Ibrahim; Usama Issa; Mamdooh Alwetaishi; Ahmed Abdelhafiz; Amal Shamseldin; Mohammed Al-
Surf; Mosleh Al-Harthi; and Ashraf Balabel. Strength and Water Absorption of Sustainable Concrete Produced with Recycled Basaltic Concrete
Aggregates and Powder. Sustainability 13, no. 11 (2021): 6277.

At this stage the research transitions from the urban mining workflow to material experimentation.

Ramming as a Design Parameter

Across these references, ranging from prefabricated blocks to in-situ manual and mechanical techniques, it is observed that variations in pressure and layering contribute to both structural integrity and architectural expression.

Figure 12: Understanding the Elements of Effective Ramming. Herzog & de Meuron (2014) Ricola Kräuterzentrum. ZEST Architecture (c.2021) Learning to design
and build a rammed earth wall.

Compaction Experiments

A 7 cm mold was used, with ramming for compaction and sealed curing to control airflow.

Figure 13: Fabrication Parameters.

Formulation and Demolding

The first batch of experiments consisted of 12 different recipes, exploring a range of binders, including soil, cement, lime, and geopolymers, alongside varying particle size distributions.

Figure 14: Experiment Set A Dry Ramming.
Figure 15: Experiment Set B Binder Controlled Cohesion.
Figure 16: Experiment Set C Phased Binder Ratios.
Figure 17: Experiment Set D Low Carbon Mineral Binders.

Compression Performance Tests for Experiments B, C, D

After 14 days of curing, compressive strength tests were conducted on all prototypes. The highest-performing mixes were identified as those using geopolymers and cement as binders. However, geopolymers were excluded due to their variability, lack of standardization, and complex chemistry, which made it difficult to isolate and accurately evaluate the performance of CDW materials.

Figure 18: Compression Test and Analysis.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Figure 19: Next Steps.

The findings established cement as the primary binder, highlighted the need for optimized particle distribution, and revealed strength loss due to moisture evaporation during curing.

Experiment Set E: Testing Aggregate Variation

Experiment set E focuses on testing aggregate variation in compacted construction and demolition waste elements. The same procedure was applied, 7 cm mold, with ramming for compaction and sealed curing to control airflow.

Figure 20: Fabrication Parameters.

The prototype’s composition is as follows, with the corresponding ratios: cement 1, fines 0.81, aggregates 5.27, and water 0.86. The aggregates, which make up 66.3% of the mix, are distributed across four particle sizes: 15 to 25 millimeters, 10 to 15 millimeters, 5 to 10 millimeters, and 2 to 5 millimeters. This range allows us to test different packing and interlocking behaviors.

Figure 21: Formulation.
Figure 22: Recipes E1-E3.
Figure 23: Recipes E4-E6.

The same curing process was conducted for Experiment E, using a duration of 7 days. Compressive strength tests were then performed on all prototypes. The results show clear variation based on particle distribution and material composition. The best performance was achieved by recipe E6, which reached approximately 7.73 MPa. This indicates that combining aggregates with ceramic particles improves strength through superior interlocking and material interaction. Secondary results show that E5 and E1 reached 6.33 MPa and 5.99 MPa, respectively. Both are balanced mixes, suggesting that well-distributed particle sizes contribute significantly to structural performance.

Figure 24: Compression Test and Analysis.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Figure 25: Next Steps.

This experiment highlights three key findings: First, granular interlocking and hybrid material mixes improve performance. Second, the increase cohesion, bonding, and overall strength. And third, controlled curing plays a critical role in achieving consistent results.

Experiment F: Optimization

The research then progressed to Experiment F, where fabrication parameters were further refined by increasing the mold size to 10 cm and introducing vibration during casting to improve compaction. After casting, the molds were sealed with plastic for the first 24 hours to retain moisture and ensure proper hydration.

Figure 26: Fabrication Parameters experiment F.

For this recipe, mix proportions were calibrated to match a 20 MPa concrete benchmark. Aggregate size was limited to below 15 mm, as larger particles were unsuitable for the mold scale and could compromise the reliability of compressive strength results. A finer particle range of 0.6–1.2 mm was also introduced, intended to function similarly to sand in conventional concrete mixes by improving packing density and cohesion.

Figure 27: Formulation experiment F.

The particle distribution was balanced with a slight dominance of 5–10 mm sizes. The only variation between the two recipes was the addition of 10% gypsum board powder in the second mix.

Figure 28: Recipe F1-F2.
Figure 29: Table summarizing the results of all the compression experiments.
Figure 30: Manual Sanding.
Figure 31: Polishing.
Figure 32: Sanding Closeup.

An aesthetic surface was achieved after sanding the top surface of our molds.

Figure 33: Surface finish achieved with larger ceramic chunks.
Figure 34: Surface finished achieved with recipe F1.

At this stage, the project transitions from compression-based systems to spanning elements, where tensile performance becomes critical. The focus shifts toward introducing tensile capacity within a predominantly compressive CDW material system.

Architectural Systems

CDW-based systems typically perform well in compression, similar to masonry or vault structures. However, spanning systems require a hybrid approach that combines compression and tension. This leads to the exploration of reinforced slab systems and tension-integrated structural strategies.

Figure 35: Types of spanning elements. Allen, E. and Zalewski, W. (2010) Form and Forces: Designing Efficient, Expressive Structures. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Spanning Element Focus

Precedents such as the Smart Slab and structural reuse projects demonstrate how geometry and fabrication enable efficient spanning systems. These references inform the development of a ribbed, material-efficient slab system.

Figure 36: Spanning Element Systems. Digital Building Technologies, ETH Zurich (2018) The Smart Slab: 3D-printed formwork for a radical new concrete aesthetic. ETH Zurich. GXN (no date) Structural reuse of concrete in London. GXN Innovation / 3XN Architects.

Experiment Set G: Bio-based Tension Systems

Initial prototypes explored fabrication methods such as ramming and vibration during casting. These tests highlighted the role of compaction in influencing density, bonding, and overall material performance.

Figure 37: Fabrication Parameters.
Figure 38: Fabrication Parameters.

Bio-based materials, including jute, willow, and arundo donax, were tested to introduce tensile capacity. While these improved cohesion, their structural contribution remained limited and inconsistent.

Figure 39: Formulation and Tensile Systems.

Post-demolding observations revealed variations in surface quality and internal bonding. The material exhibited brittle behavior, particularly under tension-dominated conditions.

Figure 40: Demolding prototypes.

Flexural Performance Tests Experiment G

Flexural tests showed incremental improvements across iterations; however, performance remained insufficient for structural applications. This indicated that material modification alone could not resolve tensile limitations.

Figure 41: Compression Test and Analysis.

Failure patterns revealed brittle cracking and lack of tensile continuity. The system demonstrated sudden failure rather than gradual load redistribution.

Figure 42: Visual Analysis.

These limitations led to the integration of reclaimed steel rebars sourced from construction waste. The system evolves into a hybrid model, where compression is managed by the CDW composite and tension by steel reinforcement. Cement remains the only new material introduced, while all other components are reclaimed.

Figure 43: Experiment Set H: Steel Rebars.

The highest flexural performance was achieved using steel rebars, reaching 4.4 MPa.

Figure 44: Flexural Test Results.

Experiment Set H Tension Systems

The mold dimensions were increased, and vibration was introduced during casting to improve specimen quality.

Figure 45: Fabrication Parameters.

Four different reinforcement systems were evaluated to understand how each strategy influenced the structural behavior of the recycled concrete slabs. This comparison established the basis for identifying the most efficient reinforcement solution.

Figure 46: Tensile Systems Mold Designs.

Each reinforcement strategy represented a different approach to resisting tensile forces within the slab. The systems included wooden supports, metal decking, steel rebars, and a hybrid solution combining metal decking with steel rebars, allowing both conventional and alternative reinforcement methods to be assessed.

Figure 47: Tensile Systems and Demolding.

As anticipated, the hybrid system combining metal decking and steel rebars delivered the highest flexural performance during testing. The combination provided greater stiffness and more efficient load transfer than the individual reinforcement systems.

Although the hybrid system performed best, the wooden beam configuration also exceeded the benchmark value. This result highlighted the potential of timber as a viable low-carbon reinforcement alternative deserving of further investigation.

Figure 48: Flexural Test Results.

Following the initial comparison, the research shifted its focus toward the tension reinforcement systems that had shown the greatest potential. Three additional experimental configurations were therefore developed and tested.

Figure 49: Wooden Tensile Systems.

Among these, the wooden beam reinforcement system was investigated in greater detail. Different beam arrangements were explored to determine how the number and position of the timber elements influenced structural performance.

Figure 50: Demolding.

The flexural tests demonstrated that placing two wooden beams within the bottom tension zone produced the most promising results. This configuration significantly improved bending resistance and was therefore selected for further development.

The results from all flexural experiments were compiled and compared to provide a comprehensive overview of the performance of each reinforcement strategy. This comparison made it possible to identify the strongest candidates for the next stage of the research.

The comparison revealed that both steel rebars (9.04 MPa) and the configuration using two wooden beams (11.77 MPa) exceeded the benchmark value. These two systems emerged as the most promising reinforcement solutions and became the primary focus for the continued development of the slab system.

Figure 51: Flexural Test Results.

Material Prototype to Building System

ReCast evolves from a processed CDW material recipe into a reinforced prefabricated slab system. The workflow progresses from material preparation to a full-scale prototype, then to a standardized module, and ultimately to a complete floor assembly.

Figure 52: Prefabricated Slab System.

Market Position and Application Range

The system was evaluated across timber, concrete, and steel structural frameworks, each presenting distinct span requirements, structural logic, and market applications.

Figure 53: Timber, Concrete, and Steel Systems.

Product Family

The prototype served as the basis for a slab catalogue featuring short-, standard-, and long-span configurations, with variations in panel dimensions, reinforcement, and structural capacity.

Figure 54: Prototype Module.

Standardized Connection Kit

Dry connectors were introduced to facilitate rapid assembly and future disassembly, while wet connectors employing couplers were designed to provide structural continuity where greater integration was required.

Figure 55: Dry and Wet Connectors.

A connection kit was developed to define the interface between the slab system and different structural frames, addressing support, alignment, tolerances, and fixing requirements.

Figure 56: Timber System Detail.
Figure 57: Concrete System Detail.
Figure 58: Steel System Detail.

Timber System

For timber construction, the slab bears on neoprene pads supported by a steel seat, while brackets and connectors provide restraint. This configuration enhances mass and durability while preserving a dry and accessible construction system.

Figure 59: Timber System Application and Details.
Figure 60: Timber System Architectural Application.

Concrete System

Within concrete construction, the system follows conventional precast principles using bearing ledges, neoprene pads, anchors, and reinforcement continuity, making it suitable for mid-rise residential and institutional buildings.

Figure 61: Concrete System Application and Details.
Figure 62: Concrete System Architectural Application.

Steel System

In steel construction, a dry L-plate interface with bolted restraint enables rapid installation and accessible connections, supporting wider spans and flexible commercial floor layouts.

Figure 63: Steel System Application and Details.
Figure 64: Steel System Architectural Application.

Prefabricated Slab Installation

Production follows a sequence consisting of mold preparation, reinforcement placement, casting, curing, demolding, and quality control. On-site installation consists of frame preparation, lifting, positioning, fixing, and potential future recovery.

Figure 65: Controlled Assembly and Disassembly Sequence Diagram.

Final Prototype

The full-scale prototype begins with accurately fabricated formwork, where mold precision, inserts, and reinforcement placement determine the quality of the finished element.

Figure 66: Mold Preparation Diagram.

Anchors, slab perforations, timber supports, and reinforcement grids organize the prototype as a representative construction component rather than merely a material sample.

Figure 67: Fabrication Process Diagram.

The completed prototype measures 1.50 × 1.50 m with a slab thickness of 120 mm. Plan, section, and axonometric drawings illustrate the support conditions, anchorage, joints, slab thickness, and exposed recycled aggregate texture.

Figure 68: Final Prototype Diagram.
Figure 69: Fabrication Process Video.

ReCast demonstrates how material research can be translated into a prefabricated floor system.

Figure 70: Final Prototype Image.
Figure 71: Final Prototype Image.

Calculating Embodied Carbon

A workflow was developed to integrate material quantities with Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) data, enabling automated embodied carbon calculations from stages A1 to D.

Figure 72: Calculation Pseudocode.

Lifecycle Carbon Comparison

Conventional concrete slabs were compared with CDW-based slabs produced using on-site and landfill-sourced materials. The on-site scenario achieved the lowest embodied carbon by eliminating transportation.

Figure 73: Global Warming Potential Chart 1.

Steel and timber reinforcement systems were compared, revealing timber to have the lowest carbon footprint while reused steel remained a competitive low-impact alternative.

Figure 74: Global Warming Potential Chart 2.

Principles of a Spanning Element

Structural behavior was first examined by considering the compression zone at the top of the slab and the tension zone at the bottom.

Figure 75: Load Behavior GIF.

Maximum Compressive Stress

Figure 76: Strength Comparison Chart.

Structural Performance Analysis

The slab was evaluated under self-weight, distributed surface loading, and concentrated point loading to represent its primary service conditions.

Figure 77: Gravity, Surface, and Point Load Diagrams.

Optimizing Internal Reinforcement

Multiple reinforcement layouts were analyzed to determine the most efficient load transfer mechanisms.

Figure 78: Radial, Undirectional, and Bidirectional Typology Diagrams.

Principal Stress Analysis

Principal stress analysis identified the compression and tension regions, thereby defining the required reinforcement zones.

Figure 79: Principal Stress Analysis Diagrams.

Displacement Analysis

Displacement analysis confirmed that maximum deflection occurred at mid-span, consistent with structural expectations.

Figure 80: Displacement Analysis Diagrams.

Flexural Performance Analysis

The required reinforcement for the prototype was calculated using the experimentally determined material properties.

Figure 81: Reinforcement Calculation Diagrams.

Structural verification confirmed that the slab capacity exceeded the required bending resistance, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed system.

Figure 81: Structural Verification Diagrams.

The research subsequently expanded beyond the material and prototype scale to investigate the broader implementation of a circular construction ecosystem.

Scaling the System

The scalability diagram illustrates a non-linear circular workflow in which components are designed for future disassembly and reintegration into the construction cycle.

Figure 82: Industrial Scalability Diagram.

Data Informed Sourcing

An urban-scale digital interface was developed to reimagine the city as a searchable material database using publicly available municipal data.

Figure 83: Urban Mining Interface Pseudocode.

The platform demonstrates how multiple urban data layers, such as demolition sites, renovation projects, fabrication hubs, logistics networks, and material density maps, can be integrated. Building-specific analyses generate material quantities, structural information, reuse potential, expected concrete recovery, and carbon savings, enabling buildings to be identified proactively as future material banks.

Figure 84: User Interface Video.

System Design

A centralized production model is proposed in which materials are recovered through controlled demolition, transported to a central processing facility, transformed into recycled concrete, prefabricated into structural elements, and returned to the construction site for assembly into buildings designed for future disassembly

Figure 85: Proposal A Diagram.

The centralized workflow begins with the identification of suitable material resources through the urban mining platform. Buildings are selected based on material inventories and reuse potential before undergoing documentation, controlled demolition, material separation, transportation, processing, aggregate engineering, robotic slab fabrication, curing, and final transportation back to the construction site for assembly.

Figure 86: AI Generated Images Describing Proposal A Sequence.

A second proposal investigates a distributed on-site circular construction model, in which demolition sites function as temporary fabrication facilities. Materials are processed, fabricated, and reincorporated directly on-site, significantly reducing transportation while shortening the material loop.

Figure 87: Proposal B Diagram.

By transforming demolition waste into structural building components, ReCast demonstrates how localized circular material networks can contribute to rebuilding cities through a more sustainable and resource-efficient construction ecosystem.

Figure 88: AI Generated Images Describing Proposal B Sequence.
Figure 89: Final Video.