Jakarta is sinking faster than it can be redesigned. In cities like this, AI is no longer about efficiency , it is about resilience.

Introduction: The Wrong Question We Were Asking

For years, the question sounded simple: What is the purpose of AI in AEC?

The answers were predictable speed, automation, productivity. Faster drawings. Fewer errors. Leaner workflows.

That definition collapsed the moment we confronted Jakarta. Through our studio project Floating Grounds, developed in the flood-prone Penjaringan District, and through insights from industry voices such as Andrea Paindelli, Product Manager at Veolia, we realized something fundamental:

AI is no longer about efficiency. It is about resilience. In a world of sinking cities, unstable climates, and collapsing infrastructures, AI’s true role is not to design faster, but to help systems survive.

The split-screen visual of the National Monument serves as a warning: the city’s unique climate, combined with rising sea levels and land subsidence, makes Jakarta highly vulnerable to flooding. Studio Project, Floating grounds
Severe Flooding: River Sedimentation -High Rainfall- Poor Drainage. Studio project, Floating Grounds

From Human Logic to Machine Intelligence

In our project, we were not allowed to use AI. Instead, we manually performed the logic that AI is meant to master.The task: design a floating, multi-use civic center capable of adapting to Jakarta’s extreme flooding and land subsidence.

We relied on tools like Ladybug to analyze solar radiation and manually tested orientations within the constraints of an irregular L-shaped site.

Where AI Should Have Been

A generative AI model could have:

  • Run thousands of orientation iterations in seconds
  • Optimized solar exposure, shading, and heat gain simultaneously
  • Delivered the most energy-efficient configuration without guesswork

This was our first realization: AEC already understands the logic. AI provides the scale.

Solar Radiation study in our Studio project, Floating Grounds

Solving Jakarta’s Water Paradox with Data

Jakarta is a sinking city surrounded by water, yet it lacks clean water. Flooding, pollution, groundwater over-extraction, and sedimentation collide into a single contradiction:Abundance without access.

Our response was a Resilience Hub designed to manage water at a local scale. But we also saw that AI could be of a great use.

The AI Vision

In practice, companies like Veolia already deploy AI for predictive water management. Something we saw at the Andrea Paindelli Conference,

Applied to our project, AI could have:

  • Analyzed real-time rainfall, river levels, and sedimentation data
  • Automated pontoon buoyancy before floods occur
  • Anticipated stress instead of reacting to disaster

The Missed Opportunity

AI-driven product management could transform the building into:

  • A smart water-treatment node
  • A balancing system between local demand and groundwater abstraction
  • A live interface between climate data and architectural response

Architecture stops being static and becomes operational.

The image from our studion project, highlights a critical water crisis in Jakarta, Indonesia, framed by the phrase “Too much water but No water.” It contrasts the city’s high water demand with a severely inadequate piped infrastructure, leading to dangerous environmental consequences.
Screenshot from Andrea Paindelli Conference, highlights the Water Supply Forecast dashboard, a data-driven tool used to monitor and predict water demand and purchase trends. By utilizing historical data and predictive modeling, this interface enables better resource management and operational planning.
Screenshot from Andrea Paindelli Conference: how Computer Vision is being leveraged by Veolia Spain to optimize industrial water management. By using AI to monitor pump chambers in real-time, the system can automatically identify the accumulation of floating solids.

Sustainability Is Not a Material: It’s a Calculation

In Floating Grounds, we acted as the intelligence. We calculated that timber construction could reduce CO₂ emissions by up to 85% and optimized shading for Jakarta’s tropical sun. But this exposed a deeper flaw in how sustainability is validated.

Where AI Changes the Equation

Instead of choosing timber based on weight or embodied carbon averages, AI could function as a real-time carbon auditor:

  • Scanning global supply chains
  • Verifying sustainable harvesting in real time
  • Adjusting material assemblies based on live environmental impact data

That is real sustainability

Comparing Materials, from our Studio Project, Floating ground

Human Experience: When Formulas Are Not Enough

Design is not only performance: it is perception. In our project, we used the C-Value sightline formula to ensure visibility across shared public spaces.

The formula works, but it assumes ideal behavior.

AI Sees What We Miss

AI could simulate:

  • The movement of 203 people per module
  • Individual viewing angles, obstructions, and crowd behavior
  • Dead zones invisible to static formulas

AI does not replace human-centered design, it exposes its blind spots.

This image, from our studio project, explains the Parametrization of the Bowl, focusing on the technical geometry used in stadium design to ensure clear sightlines for spectators. It details the C-Value Method, a standard used to calculate vertical clearance in tiered seating

Conclusion: From Design to Performance Assurance

Our project proved something unexpected. The AEC industry does not lack intelligence. It lacks scale, continuity, and foresight.

AI’s real purpose is not to generate forms, but to guarantee performance over time. From drawings to systems. From intention to verification. From design to performance assurance.

In the age of climate collapse, that shift is no longer optional.