Design Objective
The project is located in Dallas, Texas which is the largest growing metropolitan region in the United States. We are proposing a residential and commercial development which will promote car-free living through its mixed use program.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5a/11b5a42cf5f0cf0fb725fd08b952c5b5263472b6" alt=""
Design Solution
The proposed solution is set on a 3m x 3m x 3m grid system for both residential and commercial units placed on a 50m x 100m site. Based on this grid, repeatable residential and commercial units were designed which can be aggregated using Wasp to produce a design solution. This eight storey building is envisioned as a mass timber framed structure to reduce its carbon footprint.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/572a4/572a4ebe4743ccde7b84f0986f6adb348253b4ce" alt=""
Structural Design
After selecting one of the Wasp aggregations as a building form and mass timber as structural material, we created an FE model by identifying beams and columns on 3m x 3m x 3m grid. This model was then analyzed for its structural performance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68a6f/68a6f5a3f17bc1bd97e33ac82720c8d7328a09e9" alt=""
Structural Analysis
For this study we analyzed three different options.
Option 1: Non-optimized case: Generated directly using Wasp without any inputs from Karamba. Model shows large cross sectional sizes for columns and beams with highest building mass of the three options.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b605/0b605ea3bb68713c575a3b1416417305c00b3f4d" alt=""
Option 2: Optimized case: Option 1 was optimized using Karamba. It redefined the cross sectional sizes based on the load cases. However, a large displacement is noticed at the cantilevered sections of the model.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf5ff/cf5ffb718007dc7419bdd069678d1633560320b0" alt=""
Option 3: Braced Case: Braces were added to Option 2 in order to further optimize the cantilevered sections.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f43f0/f43f00c97d811e73184c4da73d3735dfae8ef09c" alt=""
In conclusion, Option 1 has the highest mass while Option 2 showed large displacement. We have selected Option 3 for further development as it shows minimum mass and optimum displacement.
Embodied Carbon
The carbon footprint was analyzed for structural timber components using Option 3 as preferred case.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/253e7/253e7949453b1a9c2abb01423dc65c52131d4bd7" alt=""