COMPARISON CONCLUSION
OPTION 01
self weight: 1146 kg
max displacement: 0.107cm
max utilization: 0.230
mean utilization: 0.035
min utilization: 0
Pro: Overall the performs well with minimal displacement and utilization
Con: There is a small space for failure in terms of the structure’s capability to carry loads compared to Option 03
OPTION 02
self weight: 1208 kg
max displacement: 0.118cm
max utilization: 0.237
mean utilization: 0.041
min utilization: 0
Pro: Overall similar to Option 01, less bending moment than Option 01 and 03
Con: Self weight is higher which has a slight negative impact on its displacement, tension, and compression
OPTION 03
self weight: 287.6 kg
max displacement: 0.00626cm
max utilization: 0.0892
mean utilization: 0.0089
min utilization: 0
Pro: Very small amount of tensions and compression both in plates and cables. The structure is stiff and durable, therefore able to carry loads without failing. Self weight is significantly lower than the other options
Overall, Design option 03 is the most suitable folded structure with regards to its stiffness, durability and ability to carry loads. It is also the lightest structure amongst the three option. It is evident that there is very little displacement and utilization, concluding that the structure can withstand without using its maximum capacity. .
