Team member(s): Aly Mahmoud, Farida Fidvi, Chaitali Phulambrikar, Christopher Mina and Georgios Grigoriadis Modified by Aly Mahmoud on June 26, 2024 An imaginary scenario where we dig into one of this era’s social norms but in the upcoming age of intellegence. Through the narrative we try to implore on the dilemma, that in the age of another intelligence is the world a better place if AI acts and reacts more humane or more machine like. We embark on an exploration of the current AI landscape, pondering the extent to which these models exhibit human-like qualities versus mechanical efficiency.To guide our exploration, we immerse ourselves in a roleplay scenario, were we, the humans, join alongside three notable AI companions: ChatGPT, CoPilot, and Gemini.Scenario: A world where AI not only coexists with us in our daily lives but also assumes governmental duties, all while possessing personalities similar to our own. As we step into this scenario, we notice distinct characteristics in each AI companion. ChatGPT, Excels in creative and narrative-driven tasks, emphasizing humor and character dynamics.. In contrast, CoPilot impresses on technical proficiency and structured explanationsThen there’s Gemini, who integrates real-time data and factual accuracy, providing timely insights into societal issues and futuristic scenariosAI can be humane like or a more technical guide, it depends on the training it has receivedIn our comic, we feature ChatGPT as our companion, assuming the AI robot utilizes ChatGPT models We present this role-playing experiment through the engaging medium of a comic strip, effectively illustrating how AI assistants can exhibit behaviours that are remarkably similar to those of humans. By using this visual storytelling format, we can highlight the different ways in which AI can mimic human-like interactions So the story begins with a man going into a public service building and asking to process some kind of paper work ….. and it was all acting out normally till the Ai Robot assistant started Hinting to something else for the man. The man who came to finish some paper work is confused from this action but in the same time he is relating this action or words to something he experienced when there was no robots or Ai and begins to understand what it is hinting towards.. Fortunately the man was working for a company that was designing Ai models and he was intrusted with chips that held out previous experiments that were supposed to be terminated. And things playout as you see When we ponder the happily ever after of this comic, we find ourselves grappling with questions that echo the complexities of raising a child. Just as a child’s behaviour is shaped by the values and norms of not only their parents but also the society, AI models are influenced by the data and guidelines provided by their developers but also their users. This analogy underscores the potential biases in AI regulation, reflecting the diverse cultural and societal norms of its “parents” and the broader community of users. The dilemma, depicted where an AI mimics corrupt human behaviour by soliciting bribes in exchange for classified information, illustrates the critical question: Should AI strive to emulate human nuances, with all their imperfections, or maintain a more rigid, machine-like objectivity? As we ponder this, we must consider whether a world enhanced by AI would benefit more from human-like empathy and understanding or from the impartial precision of machines.