A city inside a building;
The project articulates an extra-extra large architectural typology that extends beyond the conventional scale of a singular building and aims at becoming a self-enclosed urban form. Mobilizing Buckminster Fuller’s ‘tensegrity’ structural logic, this megastructure accommodates a complex
assemblage of typologies, functions, and forms within its differentiated envelope-a geometrically and materially optimized tetrahedron which, through fractalization, subdivides its inner mass while defining an infrastructural network that operates as a container integrating diverse public spaces and landscapes, in turn (and ultimately) performing as a city within a building.
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY3.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY4.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY5.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY6.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY7.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY8.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY9.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY10.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY11.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY12.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY13.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY14.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY15.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY16.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY17.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY18.jpg)
![](https://blog.iaac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TENSEGRICITY19.jpg)