The Landscape of Risk

India has witnessed 3782 major landslides between 2015–2022.
Regions like Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Kerala, and the North-East are especially vulnerable.

Landslides disrupt cities, block roads, damage homes — and in some cases, like Wayanad in 2024, result in loss of lives and millions in damages.

The Research Question

How can remote sensing workflows help identify and assess landslide risks in Indian cities?

This is approached through:

  • Identifying high-risk areas
  • Correlating risk with urban conditions
  • Validating patterns across geographies

The Dataset Stack

Cities chosen based on three filters:

  • High landslide susceptibility
  • High population density
  • Urban clusters

Result Validation

Identified results, and screening false positives by overlaying city administrative boundary bounding boxes, and historical data of landslide points to identify citied with active landslide activity in urban and peri-urban areas.

The Study Set

The identified study set includes the following cities for the research:.
Aizawl, Darjeeling, Dehradun, Shillong, Shimla

These cities would be used for experimenting and testing correlational/analysis workflows and thus divided into:

Pilot & Test Cases

Aizawl is the pilot city, with the rest as test cases.
Each case reveals unique urban-rural dynamics, terrain variation, and vulnerabilities.

The Workflow

1. Landslide Cause Mapping

By extracting elevation, slope, land use types, and more — correlations are established.

2. Urban Vulnerabilities_Density Calculation

Using OpenStreetMap to assess how buildings and roads intersect with landslide zones.

3. Urban Vulnerabilities_Proximity Calculations

Measuring how close landslide points are to urban elements — especially roads and buildings.

Insights & Implications

Analyzing elevation distribution helps identify high-risk zones for landslides. By comparing elevation profiles across multiple regions or test cases, we can understand whether elevation alone is a consistent indicator of susceptibility.
Different land use types—such as forests, farmlands, or urban zones—show varying levels of landslide risk. Understanding the distribution of landslide points within these categories helps establish which land uses are more vulnerable.
Risk levels can be linked to specific urban features like residential areas, commercial zones, or institutions. By quantifying these relationships, we can build a more nuanced framework for measuring and managing landslide risk.
The average distance from landslide points to roads may reveal how infrastructure placement affects risk. Further analysis of road types and layouts might uncover recurring patterns in landslide occurrences, offering insights for safer planning.

The Path Forward

The methodology is:

  • Replicable across geographies
  • Adaptable to other risks
  • Built entirely with open data

Final goal: Generate urban risk maps for urban resilience planning.